供应商过程审核检查表

John Deere Process Verification Audit - Instructions,Background,This on-site audit is intended for parts with a high level of criticality to determine the effectiveness and conformance of process controls when performing work for John Deere. The work performed can include manufacturing operations at a John Deere or supplier' facility, or operations sub-contracted (sub-tier). This audit may also be performed on similar parts when the work has not yet been sourced, or when preparing for full production. It is intended to be conducted by John Deere personnel familiar with the requirements of the JDS-G223 Supplier Quality Manual, the requirements of the selected parts, and processes used in manufacturing the selected parts. ,This audit is not intended to cover the supplier's or John Deere's entire quality system. To conduct a thorough review of the supplier's quality system, an audit must be conducted an using the JDS-G223 Supplier Quality System Audit Questionnaire and led by a qualified Lead Auditor. A review of John Deere's quality system is conducted with internal audits by trained auditors or consultants.,The lead auditor and team members must be qualified to conduct a Process Verification Audit. ,Instructions,Prior to the on-site audit, review the most recent part specifications (drawing) and Control Plan on file for relevance, design level, and date. Also, review any other pertinent data or documents, such as key characteristics, Gage R&R studies, capability study information, Materials Engineering report / material certification, inspection data, FMEAs, internal and external failure data, and/or the supplier's internal procedures.,Schedule the on-site audit with the part manufacturer at a time when the identified parts are being produced with the processes to be audited, and when manufacturing personnel are available to help guide the audit. The on-site audit is led by a qualified John Deere auditor trained in the Process Verification Audit process, and who is familiar with quality processes and tools. The audit team should have representatives who are familiar with the processes and parts being audited. The audit sequence should follow the order of the steps of the process. ,Score each question on the checklist with a whole number from 1 to 3, with 3 being the highest possible score. If the question is not applicable, select NA in the scoring field. NA questions are excluded from the final score Total Point and Percentage calculations. Scoring definitions are on the checklist. Up to five part numbers or families may be audited per worksheet. ,When all the questions are scored, a total score and percentage is automatically calculated. To display scores to the supplier, you may want to group the data by selecting "1" in the top left corner of the spreadsheet. This will hide the comment fields. Select "2" to display the comments. Non-conformances (all questions scored as 1) require corrective action. List the corrective action request description and other follow-up actions in the Audit Summary and Corrective Action section. Enter corrective action requests into NCCA. Document the NCCA number on the audit report.,Data Storage,After completing the audit report, please send it to your division quality audit system coordinator to file in Supplier Evaluation Tracking system located in JD Supply Network. Delete the audit instructions and change history prior to filing the audit.,Completed audits can be viewed in Supplier Evaluation Tracking (SET) at this link:,http://smutility.deere.com/SET/servlet/com.rens.set.servlet.SETMainMenuServlet,流程验证审核调查问卷,供应商名称：审核日期：,供应商代码：供应商代表：,供应商地址：,供应商电话号码：,供应商电子邮件地址：供应商传真号码：,主审核员：审核小组成员：,主要产品（约翰迪尔零部件分类代码）：,约翰迪尔上次评估或调查的日期（如果有的话）：,审核的过程/产品：,备注：如果在审核前未提供，向供应商索取证书副本,质量体系认证、认证机构及证书有效日期（ISO、QS、ISO/TS等）：,环境体系认证、认证机构及证书有效日期（ISO 14001）：,健康与安全认证、认证机构及证书有效日期（ISO 18001）：,审核总结和纠正措施,审核总分:最高得分:百分比%: 未打分,审核总结:,纠正措施 (若是有):NCCA (s):,一般供应商考评标准 *,考评得分 **符合问题中要求的能力：纠正措施,不适用不适用 (NA)要求不适用。不需要采取措施,不符合1.0不符合要求或部分符合要求。没有任何实施或文件证明，或在实施或文件中存在重大不一致（重大不符合）。需要纠正措施请求 (CAR)，记录在 NCCA 中。需要改进2.0符合要求，但是在实施或文件中存在轻微不一致，或者处于实施的早期阶段，只能初步证明有实施效果。改进机会。推荐 CAR，但不是必需,符合3.0符合要求并且有效实施，文件完整充分。不需要采取措施,**对于每个问题，供应商必须得分 2 或以上才算被接受。使用 1 到 3 分制进行评分，其中 3 是最高分。对于不适用的问题，请输入 NA。流程验证审核清单,零件号或零件系列：,A.文件控制,n问题得分,1.0Is the part print to the current Revision Level?,零件图纸是否为最新版本？2.0Are the Control Plan documents being used up-to-date?,是不是使用最新版本的“控制计划”文件？3.0If the Control Plan at the supplier is not the same version as the one at John Deere, was the change process followed per JDS-G223?,如果供应商的“控制计划”与 John Deere 的控制计划不是同一版本，是否按照 JDS-G223 执行变更流程？4.0aDo the process control documents adequately address all process parameters and product characteristics?,流程控制文件是否足以处理所有的流程参数和产品特征？bAre the Product and Process Key Characteristics known, visible, and is there a documented control plan in place to continuously monitor the process control and capability? ,产品和流程关键特性是否众所周知、可见？是否有相应的成文控制计划来对流程控制和能力进行持续监控？cIf the part has Key Characteristics, have a Gage R&R and capability study been performed? ,如果零件具有“关键特性”，是否会执行量具 R&R 和能力分析？dIf the key characteristic has a Cpk < 1.33, does the Control Plan follow the requirements of the Continuous Process Monitoring Matrix?,如果关键特性 Ppk 或 Cpk < 1.33，“控制计划”是否遵循“持续流程监控矩阵”的要求？eAre cleanliness requirements documented on the Control Plan?,清洁度要求是否记录在“控制计划”中？5.0Are the Process flow diagrams, PFMEAs, Capability Studies, and Gage R&Rs controlled and up-to-date?,流程图、PFMEA、能力分析和量具 Gage R&R 是否受到控制且为最新版本？6.0Are other pertinent process control documents up-to-date? (Examples: process sheets, inspection and test instructions, standard operating procedures, preventive maintenance instructions),其他相关的流程控制文件是否为最新？（例如：流程表、检验和测试指导书、标准操作程序、预防维护指导书）,7.0Are Suppliers' (sub-tier) documentation of the above (questions 1-6) for key characteristics controlled and up-to-date?,关键特性的上述（问题 1-6）供应商（次级）文件是否受到控制且为最新？8.0Are computer programs used in the manufacturing process secure, controlled and backed up? (Examples: CNC & PLC programs).,制造流程中使用的计算机程序是否安全、受到控制并已备份？（例如：CNC 和 PLC 程序）。B.材料和流程控制,9.0aIs the Control Plan applied at each operation and being followed, from incoming material to shipping?,是否在每个操作（从入厂材料到出厂产品）中都采用并遵循了“控制计划”b Is the frequency of inspection being performed as described in the Control Plan?,是否一直在按“控制计划”中描述的频率执行检查？cAre the inspection method and equipment being used as described in the Control Plan?,是否一直在使用“控制计划”中描述的检验方法和设备？dDo the operator instructions reflect the requirements of the Control Plan?,操作员指导书是否反映了“控制计划”的要求？10.0Do the sample size, frequency and sampling method take into account the sources of variation? (Examples: multiple machines or fixtures for same characteristic, multi-cavity molds for the same part, and changes over time, like tool wear and environment),样品量、抽样频率以及抽样方法是否考虑了差异来源？（例如：同一特征的多件机器或设备、同一零件的多模穴模具以及随时间发生的变化、可能的工具磨损和环境）,11.0Are other pertinent process control documents in place and being followed? (Examples: process sheets, inspection & test instructions, standard operating procedures, preventive maintenance instructions),是否有其他相关流程控制文件并且遵循了这些文件？ （例如：流程表、检验和测试指导书、标准操作程序、预防维护指导书）,12.0Is inspection data retained and stored appropriately?,是否适当保留和存储了检验数据？13.0Are instructions included for packaging to protect the parts (both in-process & final) from damage & contamination, & are they followed?,是否包含包装零件（进行中和最终）以防止损坏和污染的说明？是否遵循了它们？14.0Are operators properly trained to perform their operations? Are appropriate personnel properly trained for performing work involving key product and process characteristics (especially for special processes)? ,操作员是否接受了执行他们操作的适当培训？ 相应人员是否接受了执行关键产品和流程特性相关工作的适当培训（尤其是特殊流程）？C.工具/量具,15.0Is there an understanding of which tools/gages are needed for each operation, and are the needed tools/gages at the work station?,是否了解每道工序需要哪些工具/量具？工作站中是否有需要的工具/量具？16.0Are any tools/gages being used or needed but not called out?,工具/量具是否正被使用或是否需要但并不是紧急维修？17.0Does the operator understand the proper use of the tools/gages and is he/she using them properly?,操作员是否了解工具/量具的正确使用方法？他/她是否在正确使用它们？18.0Is equipment, including tooling, properly maintained?,设备（包括工具）是否正常维护？19.0Are all the gages calibrated and records retained?,是否保留了所有量具校准和记录？20.0Do Gage R&R studies have acceptable results?,量具 R&R 分析是否具有可接受的结果？D.纠正措施,21.0Is the Reaction Plan listed on the Control Plan effective & being followed?,“控制计划”上所列的“响应计划”是否有效且被遵循？22.0Is there an adequate process for isolation & control of non-conforming material (inc. Customer Notification) & is it being followed?,是否有适当流程来隔离和控制不合格材料（包括客户通知）？是否遵循了该流程？23.0Is an effective closed-loop corrective action process, including identification of root causes, fully implemented? Does the supplier use NCCA, as appropriate?,是否完整实施了有效的闭环纠正措施流程（包括根本原因确认）？供应商是否使用 NCCA（如适用）？E.变更控制,24.0What is the change control process, and is it effective? (All part and process documentation, including Control Plans, must be updated.) ,什么是变更控制流程？它是否有效？（包括“控制计划”在内的所有零件和流程文件都必须更新。）,25.0Are Change Control Procedures followed in accordance with JDS-G223 (Supplier Change Request)? Does this include applicable sub-tier suppliers?,是否按照 JDS-G223（供应商变更请求）遵循了变更控制程序？这是否包括适用的次级供应商？F.评分汇总,总分96.0Maximum Points Possible,适用总分百分比（NA 问题除外。）,John Deere Process Verification Audit - Change History,DateDivisionWho Made ChangesReason for Change,38843.0AgMark PershingProposed Form,39322.0Ag, C&F, C&CE, JDPSMark Pershing, Marilyn Dumolien, Daryl Fortin, Gary Watson, Dan Falkenstein, Todd Herzog, Theodore TylerAdopted by Enterprise Team,40094.090.0K'uang KuTranslated into Chinese